I think the main reason people prefer TUI are certain assumptions that come with it. Like I assume a TUI runs on vim like shortcuts, allowing me to move with hjkl. It isn't the case everywhere, but it's what I have observed mostly.
When a software is created for the terminal, it can expect the users to know these certain shortcuts. But this cannot be assured for GUI.
https://www.unslop.news/ has been a breeze of fresh air to avoid all the LLM news. I don't care so much about them but there's so much LLM-adjacent content that it requires actual effort to find the non-LLM stuff.
LLGo v1.0 is compatible with Go 1.20+ source code and supports the complete Go 1.26 language syntax, as well as cgo.
Compatibility is checked against applicable upstream GOROOT/test cases using pinned Go 1.25 and Go 1.26 toolchains.
LLGo is a Go compiler based on LLVM in order to better integrate Go with the C ecosystem, including Python and JavaScript. It's a subproject of the XGo project.
LLGo aims to expand the boundaries of Go/XGo, providing limitless possibilities such as:
* Game development
* AI and data science
* WebAssembly
* Embedded development
* ...
How can these be achieved?
LLGo := Go * C ecosystem
LLGo is compatible with the C ecosystem through the C Application Binary Interface (ABI), while LLGo is compatible with Go at the source-code level. The C ecosystem includes languages that expose C-compatible interfaces (e.g. C/C++, Python, JavaScript, Objective-C, and Swift).
This claim was new to me recently, but I've seen it's become widespread. From other HN threads, it sounds like it's based on what Judge Alsup wrote in the Bartz v. Anthropic case, in which Anthropic's destroying scanned books was one factor supporting a finding of fair use.
I could see companies wanting to try to fit their activities into the same contours that the court approved there, since they could then argue that they should be just as protected as the defendant in that case was (that is, it may have inadvertently established a set of practices that companies would like to copy). However, it doesn't seem to me that the court concluded that destroying books was necessarily required (in particular because the contrary scenario wasn't examined there). That is, the court felt that destroying scanned books made the fair use argument stronger, but didn't say, as far as I know, that the fair use argument would necessarily fail without it.
But indeed, I guess it might take a lot for a company to decide to create a different and untested fact pattern and then defend it from scratch in new litigation.
>In May 2005, A/I was ordered to close the mailbox used by the Italian Anarchist Black Cross, Crocenera Anarchica, amid a sprawling investigation involving allegations of anarchist conspiracy and subversion. A/I complied with the court order
Thhe prompts are written very creatively but that level of creativity isn't present in the end result really. Kinda makes me question what the point is
OK. I'm imagining such a password management system. I don't see why it makes sense for the government to ban Microsoft from using that company's password management system for Minecraft, just because Microsoft also happens to sell Microsoft Office to the DoD.
In my experience plotter art is a fantastic creative outlet for programmers/people with math backgrounds, especially if your day job doesn't produce anything physical in the real world. Shameless self-plug but I recently animated some old plotter pieces which was surprisingly easy since most of my plots were just piles of math that could be parameterized over time without too much hassle: https://chriskw.xyz/art/
Also big shout out to Michael Fogleman who's pieces inspired me to impulse buy an Axidraw at the beginning of quarantine: https://www.michaelfogleman.com/plotter/
Assuming these cameras capture only license plate data (which cannot, and does not, happen) even the 100% elimination of all vehicle-involved criminal activity (which cannot, and will not, happen) cannot possibly justify the creation of a searchable database of every vehicle-involved non-criminal activity. Especially when access to that database is for sale.
Also a good alternative title for this piece would be “A Thought-Cop’s Case for Big Brother”.
When a software is created for the terminal, it can expect the users to know these certain shortcuts. But this cannot be assured for GUI.