Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Except not if my lawn care cost goes up too much, I'll just fire my lawn guy and do it myself.

I'm not holding a gun to my lawn guy's head to coerce him in any way. This is what he chose to do to make money, in the face of all other money making opportunities.

If he took another job or income source tomorrow, and simply didn't show up again and didn't let me know, I have no power or authority to get him back behind a mower.

If he's doing it out of fear, it's not fear I'm placing into him. He has plenty of other ways to make money, so if fear of doing those jobs is what's driving him into the lawn care business, then nobody but him is responsible for cultivating that fear.

There's nothing wrong with mowing somebody's lawn, he beautifies my property, saves me from working in the heat, and in exchange I pay him slightly more than what he asked.

There's innumerable other things he could be doing for money, but he chose this one. Since he's good at his job, reliable and reasonably priced, I and my neighbors benefit from his choice and he benefits from having blocks of contiguous neighbors all hiring him.

Bonus, he even has two employees who he keeps in the labor market.



You're might not be holding a gun to his head, but at the end of the debt collection chain there is more than enough coercion and disenfranchisement to keep people doing things they don't want to do.


you know, most people in the US are capitalist. if you want to push the idea of a basic income, it's probably not a good idea to get all communist-y and stuff.


because pointing out the non-state chain of force is so much more out of fashion than the "taxes=theft" of the ur-capitalist rand worshipers?


ooh boy, you have a lot to learn about sales and marketing of ideas.

but i guess that would make sense, .. since.. well, you know.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: