God knows their coverage of other topics I'm knowledgeable about isn't much better.
They cover some political and recent-events stuff solidly (international topics much less so), but the domain-specific sucks well outside of agricultural policy. If ag policy and computer security and rock climbing are all poorly covered, I eventually have to assume they aren't doing any better on the topics I don't know.
(Where, of course, "terrible" and "better than most" are not contradictory.)
They cover some political and recent-events stuff solidly (international topics much less so), but the domain-specific sucks well outside of agricultural policy. If ag policy and computer security and rock climbing are all poorly covered, I eventually have to assume they aren't doing any better on the topics I don't know.
(Where, of course, "terrible" and "better than most" are not contradictory.)