Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I actually tested the random distribution of Spotify's shuffle functionality: http://michaelmcmillan.net


Spotify wrote a brilliant blog post on this. Highly recommend reading.

https://labs.spotify.com/2014/02/28/how-to-shuffle-songs/


As it is apparent from the comments, most people want the playlists shuffled, but after a song is played, it is taken out of the set that's to be shuffled. So a song is never repeated.


Read the blog post, what you their feedback was about is the same artist playing for too long.


From anecdotal evidence, I understand that the algorithm has since been changed


I have a theory that Spotify doesn't do random shuffling, but weighted shuffling, so that new items are more likely to be at the top of a shuffle (or maybe even popular items). I also believe that this will satisfy users better than true random shuffling.

About your linked post: You don't test the randomness of the shuffling, you only test if a shuffled list contain one and only of each original item.


>I have a theory that Spotify doesn't do random shuffling, but weighted shuffling, so that new items are more likely to be at the top of a shuffle

Amazon Music does this and it annoys me. Just because I added something a while ago doesn't mean I want to hear it less.


Spotify officially says it's not random.


Spotify's shuffling is most certainly not random. Every once in a while I get a bug where it simply shuffles through various songs from 4-5 albums and will never pick songs outside that set. Restarting the app corrects the behaviour. To me that's some level of proof, because the songs are all there. So what's the algorithm really doing?


I get this as well, and I think it gets worse the larger the playlist. It really makes me miss itunes' shuffling algorithms.


I appreciate the simplicity of your site but it is definitely difficult to quickly see where one post ends and another one starts.


On your website you put a source mark on the statement 'This is the same reason the Brits mistakenly assumed that the Germans had an exceptionally good aim with their V-1 flying bombs during World War II '

I'd like to read about this, do you still have the intended link?



Thinking fast & slow by D.Kahneman mentioned this same story




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: