No. It's an article that's pointing out a problem with a field of study that points out problems. Which is not just a valid concern, but rather critical to keeping that field of study from the problems of groupthink.
> However, all one needs to do is look outside the ivory tower and ask if there are real injustices in the world, and the answer isn't hard to find. The vast majority of activists I know, women and men fighting for the rights of women, people of color, animals and trees have no interest in the battles over grievance studies.
> This is not an article written in good faith. Which is to say, it's propaganda.
I don't know what you're trying to say here. It sounds like you're saying that because you don't care about the problems listed in the article, and that there are other problems to talk about instead, that by focusing on these problems in the article, it must have been written in bad faith?
> However, all one needs to do is look outside the ivory tower and ask if there are real injustices in the world, and the answer isn't hard to find. The vast majority of activists I know, women and men fighting for the rights of women, people of color, animals and trees have no interest in the battles over grievance studies.
> This is not an article written in good faith. Which is to say, it's propaganda.
I don't know what you're trying to say here. It sounds like you're saying that because you don't care about the problems listed in the article, and that there are other problems to talk about instead, that by focusing on these problems in the article, it must have been written in bad faith?