That's just not true at all. Everyone's money goes into the same pot. And "passive" investments are essentially just crowd-sourced active investments.

For every dollar passive investors produce in the market active investors produce 22. Who do you think is paid more attention too?

I'd love to see a citation for that, including fees siphoned off.

Are you saying that the total market value of active investments is 22x that of passive investments? Or are you saying that net returns of active investors are 22x higher than that of passive ones? Or are you saying that the total returns of active management is 22x that of passive returns?

None of those three things are true.