It's just the same old piracy arguments as always. Using a legal loophole is not the same as selling drugs or not follow safety regulations.
Grooveshark is not doing anything illegal even if they might be "abusing the law".
The fact remains that people want to consume music in a way that the music industry does not allow.
If it werent for legal loopholes we wouldn't have YouTube and we wouldn't have tourism in eastern Europe.
The world isn't as black and white as you portray it and Grooveshark provides an amazing service of much higher quality than Spotify.
We can't all sit on our hands and do nothing because someone in the world thinks we shouldn't. Innovation sometimes requires using loopholes.
Grooveshark is not doing anything illegal even if they might be "abusing the law".
The fact remains that people want to consume music in a way that the music industry does not allow.
If it werent for legal loopholes we wouldn't have YouTube and we wouldn't have tourism in eastern Europe. The world isn't as black and white as you portray it and Grooveshark provides an amazing service of much higher quality than Spotify.
We can't all sit on our hands and do nothing because someone in the world thinks we shouldn't. Innovation sometimes requires using loopholes.