Thanks for responding. But that study says they assumed the results were false p... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		mrfusion on April 3, 2020 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Lyme disease bacteria eradicated by new drug in ea... Thanks for responding. But that study says they assumed the results were false positives. Maybe for the purpose of that paper that’s fine. But I’m not sure if it supports your statement.

megous on April 3, 2020 [–]

They also list a few reasons for the assumption.

Anyway, the study itself is not the reason for the quoted statement on the CDC page. I was just trying to find some relevant basis for the statement, and this study has some reasons listed in the dicussion/conclusion.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact