Just in case it is not obvious: These rejection letters are fictional[1], created as collage of negative reviews Santini received.
Thanks for pointing that out. I hope everyone gives your comment the upvote it deserves. That this submission was just a made-up joke was not obvious from
1) the domain currently hosting the document, one of the first things I check on each submission,
2) the submission title (which is NOT the original article title, contrary to the Hacker News guidelines), which sounds much too serious for a title on a joke article,
or
3) the first few comments, which treated the article as though it reported historical facts. Good for you to let us know what the background is.
Thanks for pointing that out. I hope everyone gives your comment the upvote it deserves. That this submission was just a made-up joke was not obvious from
1) the domain currently hosting the document, one of the first things I check on each submission,
2) the submission title (which is NOT the original article title, contrary to the Hacker News guidelines), which sounds much too serious for a title on a joke article,
or
3) the first few comments, which treated the article as though it reported historical facts. Good for you to let us know what the background is.